3 years ago

Do you think it is fair for law enforcement officers to be able to stop and frisk citizens? Why or why not?

Law

2 answers:

Reil [10]3 years ago

8 0

It can and it cannot be, it can go either way based on the reason why they have stopped the person?

Gnom [1K]3 years ago

6 0

I think it can be under the umbrella that you have probable cause. For example someone smoking a cigarette is not a probable cause. But someone handing another person a small package with some powder in it is. But to stop and frisk because you are bored is not a probable cause.

You might be interested in

GIVING BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

Explanation:

because i just know it and i did it

5 0

3 years ago

Courts normally do not enforce the terms of click-on agreements. Group of answer choices True False

Orlov [11]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

How does an appellate court differ from a trial court?

Aleksandr [31]

Answer: B

Explanation: Appellate courts focus on questions of law, NOT on questions of facts like the trial courts. The appellate judges want to know whether the law was applied accurately. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court.

5 0

3 years ago

Select the correct answer.<br> Which statement is true of the zero tolerance policy?

Anettt [7]

What are your options hun:)

8 0

3 years ago

Why do we call earth a blue planet?

Elena L [17]

Answer:

because it of the water

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers