Answer:
Howard Zinn's history is often at odds with how Republicans and Federalists portray history. While Republicans tend to portray Abraham Lincoln as the person who ended slavery, Zinn sees Lincoln as a figure who transitions Black people into a different kind of slavery. While Federalists claimed a big central government would be the best way to look out for the interests of all people, Zinn claims the Federalists's main priority was to advance the interests of the wealthy.
Zinn's view was that traditional American histories were sympathetic to the nation's social and economic elites. The aim of the revolution, Zinn argues, was to divert colonial class anger of the 1760s, shifting it away from colonial assemblies and onto the British government.
Zinn believes that the Constitution does not provide adequate protection for certain segments of the American population. He says in regards to this concept: The slightly prosperous people who make up this base of support are buffers against the blacks, the Indians, the very poor whites.
Explanation:
Many evolutionary biologists argue that the state of nature and war are connected because there are limited resources on Earth, so people with always be fighting one another to gain more resources.
USA, because that is were the Rocky Mountains are.
Answer:
Explanation:
Abolitionists.... Hope that helps!!!
In the court case Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court justified that the 14th amendment allowed for separation by race as long as the treatment was equal. However, this case would soon be declared unconstitutional in the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education. It turned out that African Americans still received inferior treatment even under the separate but equal idea.
