1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
storchak [24]
2 years ago
10

What might have happened if the south had refused to adhere to reconstruction guidelines?

History
2 answers:
skelet666 [1.2K]2 years ago
5 0
More or a longer war/s
vesna_86 [32]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

When the Civil War ended, leaders turned to the question of how to reconstruct the nation. One important issue was the right to vote, and the rights of black American men and former Confederate men to vote were hotly debated.

In the latter half of the 1860s, Congress passed a series of acts designed to address the question of rights, as well as how the Southern states would be governed. These acts included the act creating the Freedmen's Bureau, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and several Reconstruction Acts. The Reconstruction Acts established military rule over Southern states until new governments could be formed. They also limited some former Confederate officials' and military officers' rights to vote and to run for public office. (However, the latter provisions were only temporary and soon rescinded for almost all of those affected by them.) Meanwhile, the Reconstruction acts gave former male slaves the right to vote and hold public office.

Congress also passed two amendments to the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment made African-Americans citizens and protected citizens from discriminatory state laws. Former Confederate states did not get congressional representation until they adopted this amendment. The Fifteenth Amendment guaranteed African American men the right to vote.

Most of the documents in this section are related to the right to vote and how voting actually occurred in Southern states. Other rights are also discussed in some of the documents. As you read the documents, weigh the various arguments that are made. Also, look for similarities with issues or concerns that have been raised in more recent U.S. history.

You might be interested in
What is the difference between an archeologist, paleontologist and an anthropologist? What are their jobs and how are they simil
alexgriva [62]

An archaeologist deals with human history. A paleontologist studies fossils. and an anthropologist studies with past and present humans

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the name given to low cost,multifaceted dwellings in the cities in the late 1800s?
tester [92]
Tenement I think that's the answer
4 0
3 years ago
Identify these terms, people and places during the 1920’s
Drupady [299]

Answer:

Speakeasies:

Speakeasies were illegal bars where drinks were sold during the time period of Prohibition. ( It was called a Speakeasy because people literally had to speak easy so they were not caught drinking alcohol by the police.)

The Harlem Renaissance:

The Harlem Renaissance was the growth and exposure of African-American culture (such as music and literature) based in the African-American community. It formed in Harlem, New York and began in 1920 and ended in 1940.

Jazz Music:

Jazz Music is a style of music that has a strong but flexible rhythmic understructure with both solo and ensemble improvisations on basic tunes and chord patterns.  

Prohibition:

Prohibition was a total ban on the manufacture, sale, and transportation of liquor throughout the United States.

Hope this helps :)

3 0
2 years ago
What are the pros and cons of globalization condensed?
Maurinko [17]
Pros of globalization:

-It can increase trading ,and the developing countries would have an greater access to market overseas,hence the more developed countries would be able to enjoy cheaper goods while the developing countries would be able to buy goods with higher quality.

-It promote cultural intermingling and countries would be able to learning more about other cultures, thus building up mutual respect to each other. This is likely to lower the possibility of discrimination and divergence between people. It would also promote initiatives to create new ideas and products.

Cons

-There would be a loss of cultural divergence,which is important to building one's cultural identity as well as self-identity.

-It could potentially widen the poverty gap. Large multinational corporations are likely to dominate the market thus threatening the opportunities for local corporations or smaller brands survival.

Hope it helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Some people that didn't agree with the Puritans were:
Tom [10]

Some people that didn't agree with the Puritans were the Quakers. The correct answer between all the choices given is the second choice or letter B. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query about and it will be able to help you.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • I need help with this question please!!
    7·1 answer
  • Why would an island nation face difficulties with isolationism? then and now
    10·1 answer
  • Louis XVI was an autocrat that ruled
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST.
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP! i don’t want to fail!
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the historical significance of the declaration of independence? It contains different colonists’
    7·1 answer
  • Napoleon named himself all of the following, except
    14·1 answer
  • What happened in the 1968 olympics that relates to the black power movement
    9·2 answers
  • How did the caravel affect exploration in a positive way? Write a 1-2 paragraph response to the question. Please use textual evi
    11·2 answers
  • Most? Right??? Ahh can someone help I’m taking notes on the answers while going through
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!