Thy husband is thy lord, thy existence, thy keeper, is William Shakespeare. Lucentio throws a feast to have fun the 3 current marriages in Padua: Petruchio to Kate, Lucentio to Bianca, and Hortensio to the widow he had spoken of before.
A banquet is held to celebrate three marriages: Kate and Petruchio, Bianca and Lucentio, and the widow and Hortensio. After some witty banter, the men start arguing approximately which of them has the more obedient wife. Petruchio proposes a guess: the man whose spouse comes when she's referred to as will win the wager.
Katherine Act five, Scene 1 of The Taming of The Shrew, Lucentio and Bianca marry. Vicentio, Lucentio's actual father, comes to Padua and meets with Tranio posing as Lucentio, and a pedant instructional purist posing as him. Lucentio's plan sooner or later comes undone. Lucentio and Bianca express regretto their fathers.
Learn more about William Shakespeare here
brainly.com/question/7592021
#SPJ9
Hey there
Being the bolded verb loved, it is conjugated in the in the preterite of the indicative mood.
The indicative is the mood of the real life; it makes a statement or asks a question, and the preterite is the time of actions that already happened. In this case, the verb is showing something that happened in real life, real feelings and in the past.
Hope this helps
The correct option is this: THE WARM TEMPERATURE WILL COMPLICATE THE FAMILY'S HIKE.
From the passage given above, it can be seen that the author has carefully chosen the setting in order to pave way for the proper development of the play. The unexpected warm weather experienced by the family members when they emerge from their car will surely affect their enjoyment of the hiking session.
I don't know I didn't see the poem
Answer:
The vote will favor the political party that appointed the judges, especially if the party is still in power when the judicial decisions are made.
Explanation:
In some corrupt climes, we can see this play out heavily. Even in the US, some politicians expect justices to read their lips when delivering judgements. But this cannot be. It will be totally unfair to base judicial decisions on political affiliations and alliances. Justices are not appointed to represent the political party that appointed them. They are appointed to render fair justice using the prevailing laws of the land and on the equality of all persons.
