Answer:
fish is their most abundant resource and their main source of income
Explanation:
This activity is vital to the economies of many islands in Micronesia because fish is their most abundant resource and their main source of income. This allows them to be able to survive. Islands such as this one depend on fishing for food and to maintain a healthy and stable economy by exporting their resources to other nearby countries that would be willing to pay for such a product. Therefore, providing the islands with a steady inflow of money.
Railroads were used in West during the mid-19th century because D. they made it easier to ship raw materials to cities in the North.
<h3>What is Railroads?</h3>
Railroads serves as a means of transportation,which is been used in the United States because it's cheaper compare to other means of transportation.
Railroads was important to economy in mid-19th century because it easier to ship raw materials to cities.
Learn more about Railroads at:
brainly.com/question/11433327
Answer:
Below:
Explanation:
In the time of the Spanish American war, a lot of things were going on that could influence or fuel public opinion to go to war with Spain, there was an exaggerated form of journalism called yellow journalism which helped shape American opinion in this era, and often the paper promoted exaggerated stories, this journalism wrote about things such as a letter called the de Lôme’s letter, which an opinion about the Spanish involvement in Cuba and US President McKinley’s diplomacy was shared to the U.S. public. The public was enraged and to fuel it, even more, there was an accident concerning the USS Maine, which was a ship sent to protect interests in Cuba.
The ship exploded from a supposed bomb from a board consensus, but wasn’t discovered until later, that it was an accident aboard the ship, the ship sank quickly and most of the crew was killed, this and the yellow journalism fueled public opinion.
However, in this scenario that seems either black and white especially in the context of, if the U.S. annexation of the Philippines was right or not, there seems to be one answer, either the U.S. should have annexed them or not. But it could be argued from each side with equal validity which is why it is best to not cherry-pick reasons to support arguments which is an already made decision, rather than a scientific consensus where opinion is an emergent truth after a repeatable and falsifiable statement.
Two perspectives that will be here will be politics, the distribution of power, and then psychology, which deals with how individuals think about themselves and others.
Hope it helps....
It's Muska
The answer should be B, values.