Answer:
Answer:
They could now own land
Explanation:
During the Middle Ages, Feudalism was the predominant economic system in Europe. According to this system, serfs were bound to the Feudal Lord, the owner of the land, who gave parts of his land to the serfs so they could till the earth in exchange of a portion of their production. Peasants were not allowed to own land. All this started to change with the Crusades. The crusades weakened the feudal lords; many lost their lives or were left in the East; others became impoverished by the sale of their lands; in addition, the prolonged absence prevented them from monitoring their rights. The kings seized the vacant fiefs and tenaciously reduced the privileges of the lords. For their part, serfs and vassals reached their freedom in exchange for money. Therefore, many peasants were able to buy and own a piece of land. Also, there were peasants who went to the Crusades in the Holy Land and there they became rich men and won their right to buy and own lands.
Explanation:
The great plains is the largest dessert region.
As displayed on a production possibilities curve, an increase in technology allow a society to produce more, as long as the resources are<span>also available</span>
I think it's something to do with A. to kill as many enemy soldiers as possible
As far as official US policy is concerned their main goal or objective was to help the South Vietnamese defeat the communist Vietcong and North Vietnamese army.
This was an example of a central thread of US policy since 1945, expressed through containment, the Truman Doctrine and The Domino Theory amongst others.
Another answer could be simply staying alive. Early optimism turned to pessimism and opposition, not only in the USA but also within the US army in Vietnam. By the late 60's, many of the common "grunts" we're simply staying alive. They were willing to disobey orders, particularly from inexperienced officers, and seek solace in drugs which were freely available.
The fact that one in 5 Americans were killed by their own side speaks volumes about the organisation of US involvement and the extent to which American soldiers could