1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
velikii [3]
3 years ago
15

Give an example of something in the Constitution illustrating the separation of powers: pleaseeee ​

Social Studies
1 answer:
wel3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The U.S. president has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress

Congress must confirm the president's cabinet nominations, so they have the power to confirm or deny appointees.In exceptional circumstances, Congress has the ability to impeach a sitting president and remove him or her from office.

You might be interested in
Paige is a shy 15 year old who tries to avoid social encounters as much as possible. compared with her outgoing, socially confid
IgorC [24]

Paige might have Social Anxiety, be a Introvert, be Anti-Social, or just dose not like to be around people.


8 0
2 years ago
Which Countries Had A Totalitarianism Government During Ww2?
allochka39001 [22]
A lot of countries had totalitarian leaders during this time, such as Germany (Hitler),  Italy (Mussolini), Japan (Tojo), Spain (Franco), Portugal (Salazar), and possibly many others, too.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is securalism? ​
sineoko [7]

I've heard individuals say things like, "You have to be secular," "I am secular," etc. even in academic contexts. Then there are some who despise secularism as the ruin of this nation. Secularism is viewed as a moral value by the pro-Secularism camp. According to the anti-Secilarim camp, it is equivalent to minoritarianism.

Both parties are mistaken and misinformed.

First and foremost, we need to understand that secularism is NOT for INDIVIDUALS. For the SYSTEM, that is.

Since secularism and religious freedom are mutually exclusive, no constitution that protects religious freedom can also impose secularism on its citizens. A separation from religion is secularism. It is the system, not the individual, that is required to dissociate.

The term "System" designates the complete administrative framework, including each of its constituent and contributing parts. The System includes everything that has to do with administration, formulation and application of policy, and law and justice. These must all be unbiased toward religion. The secular discipline also applies to the political organizations that take part in the process of electing the legislative bodies. Therefore, when a political party makes the claim that it is "secular," it is attempting the age-old ruse of constructing a virtue out of a need. It cannot be anything but secular. Similar to this, a government cannot avoid being secular. The courts, bureaucracy, and legislature all operate similarly. When we refer to ourselves as a "secular nation," we mean this.

Being Secular entails being cut off from Religion. This is a requirement of the Government, not of the people who make up the Government. The same is true of the other institutions that make up the democratic system. Secularism is an institution's character, not the personality of its employees. For instance, the Prime Minister must maintain his secularity while doing his official duties, but not in his personal life. Although the members who make up a political party are allowed to follow their faith, the essence of the organization's operations must be secular. Most individuals are unaware of this.

Secularism, as a constitutional ideal, is, nevertheless, consistently violated by the political and administrative establishments, both in letter and in spirit. A secular government cannot use its policies and programs to favor or disparage any religion. However, we see that governments, both at the federal level and at the state level, flagrantly break this cardinal rule by enacting religiously-specific social assistance programs that favor certain people while excluding others. Other fundamental protections, such equality and the prohibition of discrimination based on race, religion, or other factors, are also infringed as a result. This flagrant constitutional breach is not questioned or opposed.

The canvassing of votes in the name of religion is expressly prohibited. This is what the law says:

<em>"Section 123(3) of the Act* prohibits canvassing by an electoral candidate to woo voters in the name of race, caste, religion, community and language. It also prohibits usage of religious symbols or national symbols or flag for canvassing purposes. Usage of the aforesaid are considered to be corrupt practices. The electoral candidates cannot promise any public policy which they propose to implement on being successful."</em>

<em />

[*The 'Act' refers to the Representation of the People Act 1951]

Despite the fact that this is the law, the reality during election season is the complete reverse. Why doesn't anyone challenge it? Why doesn't anyone care about it? Every day we chant hymns to secularism, yet when it comes to actual practice, we disrespect it in spirit and soul. That is the major flaw in our democratic system.

Secularism itself is not the bad guy; its improper use is.

Thank you,

Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is science a continuous progression of study?
Dmitry [639]
<span>Science a continuous progression of study because first and foremost the world still have a lot of secrets to be discovered. People also is in a continuous search for new knowledge. People always question everything and with these questions they find answers discovering new things and ideas.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sustainable devlopment ensures social justice for all <br>​
aivan3 [116]
That’s not a question
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were some weaknesses of the Continental Army?
    9·1 answer
  • investigate and critically discuss how to use mind maps,completion of assignments and essay-construction as methods of studying.
    13·1 answer
  • How can a oil rich country help and oil poor country
    14·2 answers
  • In which two ways has the writer described the character in the excerpt below? Watching the chickens cooped up in the small cage
    15·1 answer
  • Barbara and jeffrey are both psychologists. barbara believes that biology is the sole cause for psychological disorders. jeffrey
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true of Confucianism?
    7·1 answer
  • Why are river in Georgia names as they do ??
    14·2 answers
  • What word doesn't belong ages, horse, matter, side, wait
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements are correct?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement reflects a basic belief of Buddhism?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!