Answer:
A person whose salary has increased is able to purchase fewer goods and services.
Explanation:
Inflation is characterized by an increase in the prices of goods and services along with a reduction in the purchasing power.
Real income of an individual refers to the income which has been adjusted for the effects of inflation. Whereas, Nominal income refers to the income which is before any such adjustment for inflation.
In the given case, the nominal income has increased i.e if we ignore inflation. But while considering inflation, the real income of the individual has reduced evidenced by the fact that the purchasing power has reduced.
Answer:
facttttttsssssssssssssssssssssssss XD
have a good day :)
Explanation:
Answer:
c.$941.10
Explanation:
Calculation for How much would she have after 8 years
Using this formula
FV = PV(1+i)^n
FV represent future value
PV represent present value
i represent interest rate
n represent number of periods
Let plug in the formula
FV = 490(1 + .085)^8
FV= $941.10
Therefore How much would she have after 8 years will be $941.10
Answer:
The formula to calculate the Budget Balance is
Government Income - Government Expenditure
in this case
$1.05 billion - $1.06 billion = -<u> 0.01 billion or - $100 million</u>
Explanation:
A budget balance is reached when a government expenditures are equal to it's income.
In this case, since the country's only source of income it is slightly less than than what is required to run the government, it has a budget deficient.
Since the country does not export or trade with outside countries, the government will need to take out a loan to make up for this deficient.
Answer:
Option B - There are significant diseconomies of scope is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Option A is, not a condition that could improve the probability that the justice department would approve the merger.
The Herfindahl-Hirschman index is based on a restricted definition of the product market or the impact of foreign competition, the merger might be allowed.
It might also be permitted if one of the firms is in financial trouble, or if significant economies of scale exist in the industry.
Significant diseconomies of scope would only serve to make the merger less likely to be accepted.
Therefore, option B is the correct answer.