Answer:
He is referring to blacks who lived in Haiti, French colony
Explanation:
The question refers to the statement given by Napoleon Bonaparte while his army was fighting against a band of slaves in Haiti.
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
The figure in history that reminds one of Elie Wiesel is Ruth Ozeki, David Leviathan and Sholom Aleichem.
<h3>What did Elie Wiesel try to teach the world from his own tragedies? </h3>
Elie Wiesel tried to teach the world about the dark side of the Holocaust and why it is important for people to speak the truth against evil.
Elie Wiesel stated that he would never forget the first night in the camp where he was kept. He said the night turned his life into one that was cursed seven times.
Learn more about Elie Wiesel at:
brainly.com/question/5995587
The creation of the Federalist Party, that favored business, a strong government and a lax interpretation of the Constitution, and the Democratic-Republican Party, that wanted a society based on small farms and a weaker core government; changed the nature of politics in the US as they proposed a dichotomy when voting, since the Constitution had been silent about political parties.
