smart people always think of clever answers.
Answer:
Explanation: Paul-Edward is the son of a white farmer whose first name is Edward and a Black Native American mother. Paul's father had a white wife and had children with her, and refused to let Paul-Edward have his name Edward, as his mother wanted, because he hadn't allowed any of his white children to have his name, thus he was called Paul-Edward. Because he was multi-racial, Paul-Edward faced racism, ridicule, discrimination, and cruelty as he grew up.
Answer:
just wanted to let everyone and I were going to be a do late in the morning to get my head round around my stuff back to for my house so I have to pay wait till the 1st of July November and then I will be back returning to the USA for just house of course and ’dial is in the history and a couple of weeks later his son ujdj8 kidney stones were a I was zuuizk3k zuuizk3k and culture of your country and the people
I would say your answer is creating tension. the rest dont seem to work since refuting a counterclaim will make the argument weaker, but it will help the story, not bring it down. it obviously doesnt make the argument stonger, and the main purpose is for the audience to see both sides. so my answer would be creating tension. hope this helps
