Answer:
B. The average is increasing.
Explanation:
Average variables: It is the average change in the input units of production. It is calculated by dividing total amount of changes by total number of unit changed.
Marginal variables: It is change of one unit of input, which cause changes in total units of production. As the marginal variable changes, the average variable also changes as there is changes in total unit of productions.
Hence, if the marginal is greater than the average, the average is increasing.
The semi annual interest payment on a $10,000 5% bond would be $250
Answer:
The difference in human capital explains $7,863 of the income per worker gap while the difference in physical capital explains $20,181 of the income per worker gap.
Explanation:
Human capital refers to the skills, knowledge, and efforts of the people in producing goods and services. It is also known simply as labor. Physical capital refers to the "man-made" goods that assist in production, including machinery, equipment, and technological items such as computers.
In the given scenario, the income per worker in the United States is $82,359 - $54,315 = $28,044 more than the income per worker in South Korea. This is explained by differences in both the level of technology (i.e. physical capital) and the capability of workers (i.e. human capital).
We are informed that the income per worker in South Korea would be $74,496 if it had the same level of technology as the United States. This means that $74,496 - $54,315 = $20,181 of the income per worker gap between the two countries is explained by differences in physical capital. Hence the remaining difference of $28,044 - $20,181 = $7,863 is explained by differences in human capital between the two countries.
Answer:
An enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is:
(a) A collection of integrated software for every functional area within an organization.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer would be All of the above.
Explanation:
All the above mentioned parties are related with discharge of the chemical and are liable to get the clean up done. Marcantuone and Gieson are liable as they are the owners, Lessees of the dry cleaning establishment are liable as they are the ones who operated on the effected land and Previous owners under whose ownership the lessees had taken the land on lease for a dry cleaning property.
All the parties are liable for the clean up as well as the damage occured post the clean up as well as per the law.
