Answer: The people that create these drugs could possibly know if opioids are addictive and I think they do. I also feel like doctors know people's value of things sometimes and they would possibly want to ruin that for those people because they just want their paycheck. The people that make these drugs make these because they also know if someone is in a hospital and they are there for an important reason those doctors are going to give them drugs. Those drugs they make are dangerous and they know that. So, yes I believe they do put people on to addictions.
(I'm so so sorry if this is bad, I'm not so good at this writing thing)
Answer:
People must protect animals.
Explanation:
The claim of any passage will be the topic or main idea of the writer. The writer's main arguments that are presented to support the passage will be the claims of the given passage.
In the given passage about animal welfare, Bruno talks about the need for people to be more protective of the animals and think of their safety and welfare. By arguing for the people to do their bit to help animals however they can, and even providing the numbers or statistics to support his argument, Bruno makes his point to encourage people to think of animals and their welfare.
Thus, the correct answer is the fourth/ last option.
Answer:
this totally depends on what your response contains!
Explanation:
I would presume that, as long as you discussed your thoughts, and used some examples both from your life and from Thoreau's essay to back it up, you would be able to say all of these were included. Appropriate language shouldn't be hard to mark off, provided that you wrote with classroom-friendly rhetoric.
Answer:
We need to see the lines. :)
Explanation:
Answer:
b. Though solitude is not necessarily valuable in and of itself, it is important to recognize its significance within a larger community.
Explanation:
Option B is the best summary of Emerson’s view of solitude expressed in Society and Solitude.