The appropriate response is Content Validity. It is a critical research approach term that alludes to how well a test measures the conduct for which it is expected. For instance, suppose your instructor gives you a brain research test on the mental standards of rest.
Answer: The correct answers are "A. Accept" and "$ 0.01".
Explanation: Given that we talk about optimal strategy when maximizing the expected profit by the player:
In the first case It is convenient to accept the proposal and keep $ 0.12, instead of rejecting it and running out of nothing.
And in the second case it is convenient to give the classmate as little as possible so that he accepts and we have a greater profit.
The answer to the question above is FALSE. It is not Fraud by Enticement but rather, Fraud by Concealment. This happens when one party takes a certain action to hide or conceal a material fact from another party. For example, when one company decides to purchase a material from the other and that the first company decides not to show all of the details of the product, which would then later on discovered that it is not brand new or have been repaired several times, they can sued for fraud by concealment.
The answer is C because you can't misuse your powers in business
Answer:
a. Ted gets the hut; Sadie gets the rest.
Explanation:
Since Ted placed a much more higher priority on the hut by assigning it 35 points more than all other items, and Sadie placed a very low priority on the hut by assigning it 10 points when compared to all other items, it shows Ted is ready to let go of other items just to have the hut, and Sadie is ready to let go of the hut to have the other item. Hence, the "Ted gets the hut, Sadie gets the rest" splits is efficient.
