Question

1. Jon Krakauer admits that he is not objective in reporting the story of Chris McCandless, but also encourages the reader to determine whether McCandless' actions and behavior are "admirably courageous or reckless." Based on what you've read so far, which description do you think is the best fit?​

Answer 1

The above question wants a personal answer and for that reason, it is not right for me to write an answer for you, but I will show you how to answer it.

First, you should research who Chris McCandless was and what he did. During this survey, you will find the following information:

• Chris McCandless was a young man who abandoned his entire family, studies, and society to live wandering in nature.
• He claimed that he wanted to separate himself from consumer life and society based on materialism and other superfluous things.
• With that, he left home, without telling anyone, and began to live without contact with society, in the middle of the forest.
• He spent two years in this kind of life until he was found dead from starvation.

In that case, you should evaluate the attitude of Chris McCandless and conclude if you think it was a brave or reckless move.

Some people believe that it was very brave of him to reject the entire social composition and live by what he believed, but others claim that he was irresponsible with his family and with himself, as he did not appreciate the consequences of his actions.

More information:

brainly.com/question/15933708?referrer=searchResults