The inference is that the second stanza of the poem B. describes how the boy has changed
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference is the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information that given in the literary work.
The main purpose of the stanza is to show how the boy has changed. The narrator describes his memories as a boy when he used to go to the swimming hole. He has beautiful memories, and it makes him happy to remember them. However, he then says that time has taken its toll and that a boy is now an old man. The stanza, therefore, describes how the passage of time has changed the boy.
Therefore, based on the information, the inference is that the second stanza of the poem describes how the boy has changed.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
1. To beat ultimately as the heart; pound.2. To feel or be subjected to a pulsating pain: My toe was throbbing after I stubbed it.3. To vibrate,pulsate, or sound with a steady pronounced rhythm: Boat engines throbbing
pls thank me for the answer, it keeps me motivated :)
It is true that any interpretation that can be defended with evidence from the text is a valid topic for a critical essay.
In the document "Ain't I A Woman" I infer that time during that period for african american women was not equal compared to the whites. As a matter of fact in the document the author Sojourner Truth tells us " he says women can't have as much rights as men, 'cause Christ wasn't a woman! Where did your Christ come from? Where did your Christ come from? From God and a woman!". This is such a powerful sentence to me because I agree. Not only was she black, but she was a woman and yet she could still do as much as any man could. Yet she is treated unfair because she was a woman. This document shows that in the 19th century there was racism, and neglected rights toward black men and women.
Paragraph two
<span>The mood of this story is quite confusing. I really felt sad and terrible for Louise knowing that not only is she ill but her husband died. Then through out the story she starts to react differently. She starts to scream "free" and "Free! Body and soul free!". Then I started to realize that she was not sad but happy that her husband was gone and she could live her "long" life free. Yet very tragically and ironic she gets a visit from her undead husband and has a heart attack and dies. What I can infer from this story is that in that time period women had more rights. She was saying that she was free and day dreaming of the days she could have now. </span>
Paragraph three
<span>Both of these stories are from a woman's point of view. There was the same message coming from both authors and that was the woman's right to be equal or to be "free". In "Ain't I A Woman" the author wants her rights! In her tone she is demanding to be heard and to inform the audience that she deserves to do as much as any other person man or white. While in "The Story of an Hour" the author tells us a story of a woman who wants to be "Free" and live her life with no one to oppress her. I think women felt trapped and restricted and just wanted to be free.</span>
Answer:
I think its, A summary restates a text's key details, while a critique uses key details to support an evaluation of the text's main ideas.
Explanation:
