This is a subjective question, so there are certainly no "right" answers. Here are some close-examination strategies:
- Read the text through quickly, and then re-read more slowly until you feel that you understand what the text's purpose is and how each sentence contributes to a greater understanding.
- Highlight key words or phrases that show what the text's theme/topic/focus is.
- Examine the way information is presented. Is it scholarly, humorous, uncertain, etc?
- Is the text part of a larger work? If so, why is this excerpt significant? If not, then why is it meaningful standing alone?
- Research the author/person who created the text. Find out what drove them to write it or what they were trying to do.
- Is there a specific audience that the text is intended for? This relates to prior questions, but you could go deeper as well and look at how the text makes you feel, or whether you have learned a new way of thinking about something.
You can learn a lot by examining a text from different perspectives, including the typical characteristics of-- who, what, when, where, why, how?
Answer:
How have fast-food restaurants responded to people being more conscious of healthful diets?
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>Government officials downplayed the severity of the crimes committed.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Remember, it was a question asked by a journalist to a US state department press conference in which the US spokeswoman Christine Shelley avoids applying the term "genocide" to the what was happening in <em>Rwanda</em>. Despite the fact that there had been an ethic cleansing of the Tutsi tribe, with more thousands of dead bodies on the streets. Thus, government officials initially showed a lack of admittance to the severity of what was happening in Rwanda.
Jonas gives a speech, and the industry leaders change their minds.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The most contrived ending to the above-mentioned story can be that-
“Jonas gives a speech, and the industry leaders change their minds”
The above statement is counted as most contrived amongst the other available statement because It is highly unlikely for industry leaders to get pacified by Jonas advocacy for minimalistic living.
These industry leaders have their core interest and stakes at the challenge and it is highly possible that they won't leave any stone unturned in defaming Jonas as fraud and scamster.
