1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ikadub [295]
2 years ago
13

What are some historical examples of laissez-faire capitalism?

History
1 answer:
lapo4ka [179]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The factories set up during the Industrial Revolution are a pretty good example of it. 12 hour shifts, usually 6 days a week, sometimes they did 10 day weeks, where you would work 8 or 9 days. The whole family would be employed and they would need to have all been employed, wages being so low. The children would be sent under the machinery when it needed cleaning. They were especially useful for gathering the bits of cotton that dropped under the massive looms, because they could get under them, but it was considered too expensive to shut down the looms when they went under, so occasionally kids got scalped, lost fingers and sometimes died.

People often lived in towns that had been built for the factories and had the rent(often high rent that gets increased without warning) taken out of their wages, but the wages were usually paid in a “factory currency” so the only place you could spend your wages was in the factory shop, obviously at inflated prices.

Of course all the children and adults too that lost fingers and limbs had no form of worker’s compensation and disability payments, so were unable to work and had no form of an income.

I always find it odd when people want a Laissez-faire/libertarianist form of government and they think that businesses will just act for the benefit of everyone and the employees will be treated well and paid a decent wage, consumers will be charged a fair price and they will respect the environment. The reason there are so many regulations(we could no doubt lose some though) is because big businesses have proven time and time again that they cannot be trusted with no regulations.

So you have to tell them that dumping industrial waste into rivers is a bad thing, so don’t do it otherwise we will fine you.

Don’t make your workers work in unsafe conditions, otherwise we will fine you.

Pay your workers enough money to actually live on, otherwise we will fine you.

Pretty obvious things really, but you get more money if you ignore them and they have previously ignored them, hence “government interference”. It would be nice if it worked the way people want, but unfortunately the evidence points to the contrary.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statement best express is the main idea of the diagram ?
Natasha_Volkova [10]

The correct answer is D. Countries sometimes seek allies to preserve the balance of power.

Explanation

The image shows a graph in form of balance that describes the alliances between countries during World War I. In the right part, is shown the main triangle of the Triple Alliance in which were Italy, Germany, and Austro-Hungary (Serbia), also in the below part is Romania who allied a year after (1883) to be in this coalition in 1882. On the left side are shown the countries involved in the Triple Entente, which were Great Britain, Russia, Japan, and France also at the bottom was the Balkan League that joined this collation in 1912 (several years after the formation of the alliance). This image shows that the alliances had a similar number of members to have a balance of power during the war. Also, the form of balance allows concluding that there was equality of forces between both factions. Therefore, the correct answer is D. Countries sometimes seek allies to preserve the balance of power.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the united states oppose the soviet union? HELP ASAP
shepuryov [24]
They were against communistic views
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did nativists believe?
jeka94

The nativists believed that immigrants would destroy America. So, option (b) can be considered as the suitable option.

<h3>Why do nativists oppose immigration?</h3>

Joel S. Fetzer claims that conflicts over national, cultural, and religious identity frequently lead to hostility to immigration in many nations. Particularly in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, as well as in continental Europe, the phenomenon has been examined. As a result, the term "nativism" has evolved to refer broadly to opposition to immigration motivated by worries that newcomers may "distort or corrupt" preexisting cultural norms. Nativist movements try to stop cultural change when immigrants outnumber native-born people by a wide margin.

Many of the following arguments against immigrants are used to support immigration restrictionist sentiment :

Economic :

  • Employment : Immigrants take occupations that would have been open to native citizens otherwise, which reduces native employment. They also produce a labor surplus, which drives down wages.
  • Immigrants incur a cost to the government since they do not pay enough taxes to pay for the services they need.
  • Social welfare systems are heavily utilized by immigrants.
  • Housing : As vacancies are reduced by immigrants, rents rise.

Cultural

  • Language : Immigrants refuse to pick up the native tongue and withdraw into their own communities.
  • Culture : As immigrants outnumber the local populace, their culture will take its place.
  • Crime : Compared to the native population, immigrants are more likely to commit crimes.
  • Patriotism : Immigrants erode a country's feeling of ethnic and national identity.

To know more about, immigration, visit :

brainly.com/question/17124402

#SPJ9

7 0
1 year ago
Because nongovernmental organizations provide relief after a natural disaster , who/what do they usually depend on?
Usimov [2.4K]

I think they depend on stores because stores donate things to nongovernmental organizations. Also, surrounding states when a natural disaster occurs people from other states support these organizations. They depend on support and hope to get through whatever there going through.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did Washington not participate in the discussion of the Constitution
Alina [70]
hi
:-) my answer is ........ Washington was persuaded to attend the constitutional convention and subsequently was unanimously elected as its president ......Washington had to be convinced even to attend the convention .after the war of independence ,Washington retired to mount Vernon ,planning to return to life as a country squire
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Hich nation has a communist command economy?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the foreign policy doctrines of the two Bush Presidents differ?
    11·1 answer
  • William Penn referred to his colony as a “Holy Experiment” because
    7·2 answers
  • How does India system education work out
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Sherman want to attack Columbia
    7·1 answer
  • The first two major battles of the Civil War took place at
    12·2 answers
  • How did American expansion affect Texas?
    14·1 answer
  • Song Dynasty: Explain the THREE reforms made during the Song Dynasty that improved the lives of farmers.
    6·1 answer
  • What are 4 important events that happened in the war of 1812 and what are the dates?<br><br>thanks​
    14·1 answer
  • Who won the battle of cannae?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!