The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.
Hope This Helps!
The answer choice should be A
USA, UK, France & USSR
Berlin was also split into four and each of the four above also had their own sections of Berlin- however the Capitalists (USA, UK & France) all banded together to make a stronger nation, making their own new currency and building the economy from scratch; this is what triggered the Berlin Blockade & Airlift
Answer:
Edward the Confessor died on 5 January 1066. He had no children. Three men wanted to be king of England. Each man thought he had the best claim to the throne. The next king of England would have to win it in a war. Who do you think had the best claim to the throne?
Explanation:
Harold Godwinson, Earl of Wessex
Harold was a powerful and rich English nobleman. According to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, Edward named Godwinson as his successor on his deathbed. The next day, the royal council, known as the Witan, met and declared Godwinson king. An English king was proclaimed by the Witan - this gave Harold Godwinson the only claim to the throne by right.
William, Duke of Normandy
The Norman chroniclers reported that Edward had promised his distant relative, William, the throne in 1051. William was the only blood relative of Edward, but the English throne was not hereditary anyway. Claims that Edward promised the throne were probably made up by the rival sides after the event. The Bayeux Tapestry, which was made after the Conquest, shows Godwinson swearing an oath of support to William in a visit to Normandy in 1064. William was supported by the Pope.
Harald Hardrada, King of Norway, Viking warrior
Hardrada based his claim on the fact that his ancestor, King Cnut, had once ruled England (1016‒1035). He was helped by Godwinson's half-brother, Tostig.
The author shows a how a protective tariff will benefit people in his town by describing the various ways in which the protective tariff could help benefit people, making examples about how different people in town would have some benefits, like the mercantile and its commercial pursuit, or the parents and their earnings that went to the comforts of their aged parents.
<span>---
</span>The author illustrates how the town would be negatively affected if the factory was to close by portraying an imaginary future image where the factory is closed and everyone mentioned before joining in conversations, comparing the past to the present.
<span>---
The proper method for setting questions of economic and national policy is to see for themselves,</span> imagining to themselves the difference between a factory at work and a factory burnt, because when people can see the practical difference between a factory stopped and a factory active, the issue will be easily resolved.<span>
---
</span>A modern autoworker employed by an American manufacturer might favor a protective tariff today because of the aggressive competition from other brands that make life difficult for the American manufacturer, and so the hope is that a protective tariff will help them avoid such impasse.
<span>---
American consumers might oppose a such tariff because of its price, as the price for imported goods will grow, and also because the sociocultural context is different, and globalization should have come to an end to protective tariff mechanism since the manufacturer that works only with American people only on the U.S. soil are very limited.</span>
