Hello there!
I am not sure if there are options for this question, but I would say people compare the additional benefits to those of the costs.
I hope this answer helps. As always, it is my pleasure to help students like you!
Answer:
Explanation:
In some cases, one group may come to view the beliefs and actions of another group as fundamentally evil and morally intolerable. This often results in hostility and violence and severely damages the relationship between the two groups.
Answer:
The view of the nobles was that things were good. They did not want to change anything because they had the good life but the peasants on the other had a bad view. They did not have anything to eat and were very poor.
Explanation:
here is your answer if you like my answer please follow
Answer:
<em>The concept of "Human Nature" is the believe that there are some naturally existing ways that human naturally think, feel and act</em>. The idea is that some of these attribute are innate to the human species and that it defines humanity and what it means to be human. However, some of the challenges put forward by anti-fundamentalists like the philosopher David L. Hull is<em> the temporal and contingent rarity of this "essential sameness of human being" in biology</em>. Other scientific basis of the inherent human behavior like <em>Instinctual behavior and other complex behavior as observed has also been known to be malleable and not fixed as opposed to the fundamentalist that argue that this inner human nature is the same and fixed</em>.
Yes, I do agree with the challenges.
I agree with this challenges from the fact that the idea of what it means to be human is diverse and different across culture, people and even the individual. <em>Some culture promote and encourage hostility as a way of defending and expanding itself, while others see this act as inhumane</em>, and some people do not see themselves as deviants because of their believe that they are exercising their human nature. some other basis is upbringing. <em>A child isolated from the rest of the world and groomed into a specific nature will retain that nature, which shouldn't be so if the internal human natures exists and is as dominant as fundamentalists of this idea claim.</em>
In 1789 at Federal Hall in New York City