Hello!
This question is incomplete, with insufficient information to supply a sufficient answer. Please PM me the full question, and I'll be more than happy to answer it!
Have a wonderful day! :)
-L
Answer:
maybe it's character vs character
or character vs self
The term 'marriage' as defined to be "a union between a man and a woman" is said to be flawed because in this modern age, there has been a lot of marriages that is not necessarily between a man and a woman.
<h3>What then is marriage?</h3>
Marriage is known to be the state people are said to be united as one and they are called spouses in a form of consensual and contractual relationship that is known to be backed up by law.
Note that it is also seen as a kind of a mutual relation and an institution where a person is joined to another in a marriage.
Hence, The term 'marriage' as defined to be "a union between a man and a woman" is said to be flawed because in this modern age, there has been a lot of marriages that is not necessarily between a man and a woman.
Learn more about marriage from
brainly.com/question/1265280
#SPJ1
Answer:
In some of the most influential democracies in the world, large segments of the population are no longer receiving unbiased news and information. This is not because journalists are being thrown in jail, as might occur in authoritarian settings. Instead, the media have fallen prey to more nuanced efforts to throttle their independence. Common methods include government-backed ownership changes, regulatory and financial pressure, and public denunciations of honest journalists. Governments have also offered proactive support to friendly outlets through measures such as lucrative state contracts, favorable regulatory decisions, and preferential access to state information. The goal is to make the press serve those in power rather than the public.
The problem has arisen in tandem with right-wing populism, which has undermined basic freedoms in many democratic countries. Populist leaders present themselves as the defenders of an aggrieved majority against liberal elites and ethnic minorities whose loyalties they question, and argue that the interests of the nation—as they define it—should override democratic principles like press freedom, transparency, and open debate.
Among Free countries in Freedom House’s Freedom in the World report, 19 percent (16 countries) have endured a reduction in their press freedom scores over the past five years. This is consistent with a key finding of Freedom in the World—that democracies in general are undergoing a decline in political rights and civil liberties. It has become painfully apparent that a free press can never be taken for granted, even when democratic rule has been in place for decades.
Explanation:
hope it helps!
