1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Musya8 [376]
2 years ago
5

HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 25 POINTS

History
2 answers:
svp [43]2 years ago
8 0
need points sorry!!!!
MakcuM [25]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: The results of the Tehran conference compared with the goals of Allied leaders were that "Allied leaders compromised and agreed to open a second front in France."

Explanation: In World War II, the three Allied leaders gathered in Tehran to decide the strategy to be used throughout that stage of the war. On November 28, until December 1st, 1943, Soviet Union Joseph Stalin, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and US President Franklin D. Roosevelt met and decided to launch a new combat front in France to fight the German Army. They intended to invade France on June 6th, 1944.

You might be interested in
Supporters of using the atomic bomb against Japan believed it would?
Gennadij [26K]
Make Japan surrender unconditionally.

Also that it would cost less American lives.

Those who supported the use of the atomic bomb believed that Japan would surrender after a large scale attack. They also believed that it would be better than an American invasion as it would result in less American casualties.

Hope this helps!
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This stated the US would prevent European nations from interfering with independent American countries. The US also agreed to re
trapecia [35]

The answer is the Monroe Doctrine. This Doctrine was stated by the fifth President of the United States, James Monroe, on December 2, 1823, and became the foreign policy of the nation for many years.  

The doctrine stated that:

●<em> The efforts of European nations to colonize land in North or South America, are considered as acts of aggression, requiring U.S. intervention</em>.

●<em> Any interference by European nations with states of North or South America would also be perceived as acts of aggression and would call for U.S. intervention</em>.

● <em>The United States would not interfere with existing European colonies</em>.

● <em>The United States would not get involved with the internal affairs of European nations</em>.

5 0
3 years ago
La frase "nadie se baña 2 veces en el mismo rio" del filósofo griego heraclito ¿tiene incidencia en la cotidianeidad de la vida?
jolli1 [7]

Answer:

La frase del filósofo Heráclito puede reflejar su impacto en la cotidianeidad de la vida a través de la siguiente, la apreciación de la vida de cada persona como una sucesión de instantes únicos e irrepetibles, donde la aparición de un instante requiere de la "muerte" del instante inmediatamente anterior y el instante actual ha de "morir" para que surja el siguiente instante.

La unicidad de cada instante se debe a la composición y el estado de la persona, cuyo comportamiento y naturaleza es inabarcable, y su relación con los demás, aún más inabarcable. Es en ese sentido que "nadie se baña dos veces en el mismo río".

Explanation:

La frase del filósofo Heráclito puede reflejar su impacto en la cotidianeidad de la vida a través de la siguiente, la apreciación de la vida de cada persona como una sucesión de instantes únicos e irrepetibles, donde la aparición de un instante requiere de la "muerte" del instante inmediatamente anterior y el instante actual ha de "morir" para que surja el siguiente instante.

La unicidad de cada instante se debe a la composición y el estado de la persona, cuyo comportamiento y naturaleza es inabarcable, y su relación con los demás, aún más inabarcable. Es en ese sentido que "nadie se baña dos veces en el mismo río".

3 0
3 years ago
What was the main disputed territory that led to the French and Indian War?
Shalnov [3]
Upper Ohio River valley
8 0
3 years ago
Which was the most likely reason the bodies of victims at Auschwitz were creamated
NeX [460]

Answer: Prevent health hazard for the Germans.

Explanation:

The reason for the crematoriums was that the large number of dead bodies in mass graves around the area became a health hazard for the Germans working there.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • From the beginning of the shift to farming, problems involving infectious disease increased (1). Neolithic farm settlements were
    6·1 answer
  • What were some of the reasons why Leonardo da vincis technical ideas were not published?
    12·1 answer
  • The main function of a school board is to
    11·2 answers
  • By 1900, _______ made up 25 percent of Japan's total industrial output.
    10·1 answer
  • In uncle toms cabin who is the most moral character in the movie ? Explain
    11·1 answer
  • Whats the president
    11·1 answer
  • Which native american culture group cultivated corn and built adobe structures?
    15·2 answers
  • Temperance is the practice of drinking little or no alcohol. Supporting those who live in poverty. Reforming society to improve
    8·2 answers
  • Which of these was not a factor in the build up to world war 1
    7·2 answers
  • In revising the federal system we ought to inquire 1. into the properties, which such a government ought to possess, 2. the defe
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!