Answer:
Present Value= $18,181.82
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Savings= $2,000
The machine will then begin to wear out so that the savings decline at a rate of 4 % per year forever.
Interest rate= 7%
To determine the present value of the savings, we need to use the perpetual annuity formula with the decline rate.
PV= Cf/ (i + g)
Cf= cash flow
PV= 2,000/ (0.07 + 0.04)
PV= $18,181.82
Answer:
The correct answer is a. In arriving at taxable income, a taxpayer must choose between the standard deduction and itemized deductions.
Explanation:
In tax law, the tax base is the magnitude that results from the measurement of the taxable event. It is defined as the dimension or magnitude of an element of the objective budget of the taxable event that is judged as determining the relative contributory capacity.
In tax legal relations, the taxable event shows the existence of an economic capacity in the subjects, but for the tax to be applied, this fact must be assessed in some way, usually in monetary units.
The tax base is ultimately the magnitude that is used in each tax to measure the economic capacity of the subject, such that it is reflected in ceilings.
I believe this problem has the following choices:
They talk about family problems as they arise.
Renaldo discusses his ex-wife's flaws in front of the
children.
Renaldo and Inez make time each week to spend alone
together.
The family regularly spends time with other stepfamilies.
The family has enrolled in a course to learn how to avoid
problems.
From the text, we can conclude that the correct answer
is:
>Renaldo discusses his ex-wife's flaws in front of the
children.
I think it's "<span>hypothecation" but I'm not 100% sure.</span>
Hello There!
Your answer would be <u>C). A tortious act may also be a criminal act.</u>
The reason why C would be your answer is because a tortious act is something that harms someone in any way. The reason why it "may" be a criminal act is because determine if the tortious act is a criminal act really depends on the scenario that is occurring. For example, someone could cause a tortious act in a way of self defense, this scenario would be debatable because the person that committed the tortious act had a valid reason in doing so, and that was protecting themselves. But, if a person was to cause a tortious act by hurting someone to steal from them, then that would definitely be a criminal act because they are performing dangerous things to someone else, and the person could file a lawsuit against it.
Let's dive into why the other answer choices are incorrect. We can use the old fashion process of elimination:
Answer choice "A). A tortious act is always a criminal act" is incorrect because it is not always a criminal act, it depends on the scenario it's in. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "B). A criminal act is always a tortious act" is incorrect because there are MANY criminal acts that doesn't harm anyone, for example, tax evasion (not paying taxes) is a criminal act, but does not cause any harm to anyone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "D). A tortious act is the same as a contract dispute" is incorrect because harming someone is not the same as not doing what a contract says. A contact dispute is when someone that's part of a contract did not do a duty that the contract says that they're suppose to do, and that usually doesn't have to be any harm to anyone. That would not be the same as a tortious act, harming someone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
