Answer:
Ethos: appeals to status/authority
Pathos: appeals to the emotions
Logos: appeals to audience's reason with logical arguments
Knowing these^^:
For me, I would argue:
This passage, as itself, is an anecdote, as the writer speaks from their perspective: "I explained to him...". As this is an anecdote and addressing worldwide issues, the writer effectively incorporates the use of ethos and pathos. With ethos, the writer sheds light on the dangers of society today. With an urge for action, the writer throughout the passage uses parallelism, claiming "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented". The use of this parallelism heightens the importance of the writer's encourged action, putting an emphasis on the negative effects caused by inaction and silent responses to these dangers. The writer also includes pathos, appealing to the writer's audience who are aware and/or are suffering the very same issues presented, using cacophonous word choices such as "persecuted" along side other controversial topics like "race, religion, or political views". The writer clearly chose such words to evoke the audience's emotion about these topics, aiding in the writer's call to action.
hope this helpsss feel free to add to this im just trying to get an answer fast enough just in case :D
