If this was multiple choice I'd say the answer is (B)
But I'm a little confused the wording is a little whack.
Answer:
Differences between African Americans and European Americans were examined to find how ethnic identity salience was enacted in interethnic conversations, A sample of 126 African Americans and 78 European Americans was recruited from the community using a snowball sampling method. First, different factor structures for the two groups indicated that African Americans conceptualize sociocultural and political identity as separate constructs while European Americans express a singular and social definition of ethnic identity and experience less identity salience than African Americans. Secondly, although our sample is small, those who used the label “African American” expressed greater political ethnic identity salience than those who used the label “Black”. This finding is consistent with others' research indicating a continuing trend toward a positive political posture for African Americans. Third, ethnic identity was found to be negatively related to interethnic communication satisfaction for European Americans. Stronger European American ethnic identity was related to less satisfying interethnic conversational outcomes in less intimate relationships. Ethnic identity salience showed no significant relationship to interethnic conversational outcomes for European Americans communicating with friends nor for African Americans no matter the relational distance.
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
2008 would be a great example. Look up when the stock market crashes.