Answer:
Well even though im not gigivng you the two paragraphs you need, I can give you information on two of the cases so that you can write about them: McCulloch vs. Maryland: "The power to tax equals the power to destroy" -- The state of Maryland attempted to tax the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States (federally-created) -- Confirmed the legitimacy (in Marshall's opinion) of the Bank of the United States, thus upholding Congress' use of the elastic clause. Also further emphasized Article VI (Supremacy Clause) that the states had no power to tax a federal institution. Clearly defining that federal law/power trumps state.
Explanation:
Restraining order sought
The government claimed it would cause "irreparable injury to the defense interests of the United States" and wanted to "enjoin The New York Times and The Washington Post from publishing the contents of a classified study entitled History of U.S. Decision-Making Process on the Vietnam Policy."
The answer is D because it was the easies way to travel back then
Sanford Dole wanted the United States to annex Hawaii so he wouldn't have to deal with the sovereign rulers of Hawaii interfering in his pineapple and fruit production. Before US annexation, the Hawaiian Islands had been ruled as a sovereign nation. US citizens began opening businesses on the islands in the 19th century, most notably Dole and his fruit production. These US individuals did not like having to follow the rules and laws of the sovereign states and thus encouraged (through a number of unscrupulous tactics) the US to annex the islands so they could have a more business-friendly climate.