Answer: 2nd and 4th options.
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
1. he presents arguments that reaffirm that the colonies must separate from Great Britain because all men are equal before God and it is not right that one control the other. In addition, he claimed that the right to freedom, life and the search for one's own happiness without having to be in debt to someone, or needing someone's permission, were inalienable rights, so it was not up to England to withdraw or repress them. them.
2. The declaration of independence cannot be seen as a direct threat of war. This is because the colonies did not have the desire to face a military power like Great Britain. However, the declaration of independence was a complaint pointing directly to dissatisfaction with the British crown and reaffirming that the colonies would be independent at all costs, even if it generated a war.
3. He represents these arguments, showing that governments should be based exclusively on "absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority." Thus, he affirmed that governments should be representatives of the people and work for this representation and not for a concentration of power, where the people should act for the government.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Why were leaders of "big business in the late 1800s referred to as "captains of industry" by some and "robber barons" by others?
Answer:
Because those men were important businessmen in that time in the United States and created huge companies that grow immensely until they were lonely competitors in their industries. That was the case of John D. Rockefeller with the Standaard Oil Company or Andrew Carnegie with the Steel Company. Other great entrepreneurial names of the time were also Henry Ford and Cornelious Vanderbilt.
On the other hand, journalists and citizens accused these men of creating monopolies and injustice corporate practices that did not allow other companies to compete in these industries. That is why some called them "robber barons."
The major difference between Deng Xiaoping and Mao Zedong can be simply put that Deng Xiaoping was much more practical and realistic.
Deng Xiaoping was not extreme as Mao Zedong, and unlike Mao who closed the country to the world and implemented non-realistic terrible economic policies, Deng reformed the economy of China and opened it up to the world.
Deng started with the Four Modernizations, which included the agriculture, industry, technology, and science development. He opened up the country gradually to the world, and gave his best to modernize the country, catch the pace of the developed countries, and make China a strong nation. All of his policies were perfected to detail, they were realistic, practical, and very efficient, resulting in great prosperity and development in China very rapidly, making China the biggest producer of goods in the world, as well as one of the strongest nations in every aspect in the world. No wonder that he is often referred to as the ''Greatest economist in the human history''.
The answer would be <span>Archaeologists.</span>
