Answer:
The correct option here is A).
Explanation:
Option A - is correct because according to the conclusion given in the argument, charitable institutions would have to reduce their services and some might have to close their doors , which means the assumption we are going to take will have a direct affect on these institutions , now if we assume that this assumption is false, that means whether this change comes or not charitable institutions will receive donations but that is not the case , so this option has to be correct.
Option B - this option is not right because it is nowhere said that these wealthy individuals are the only source of donations for charitable institution.
Option C - this option is also not correct because here no assumption is being made, the given statement is a consequence of not bringing the change.
Option D - this option is also not correct because there can be other individuals who can make donations.
Option E - this option is also not correct because here an alternative change to tax law is being talked about not the assumption of the argument.
The idea of the government will open new opportunities for all most especially for those in the commercial real estate. It will also give a good impact in the local economy along the increasing rate of the employment rate of the affected region.
Answer: B. One asset would increase $1,750 and a different asset would decrease $1,750, causing no effect
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, the journal entry at the time of sales will be represented as:
Debit Accounts receivable $1,750
Credit Sales $1750
Now, when the credit receipt is received as illustrated in the question, the journal entry will be:
Debit Cash $1,750
Credit Accounts receivable $1,750
Therefore, one asset would increase $1,750 and a different asset would decrease $1,750, causing no effect.
The correct option is B.
<span>hey will receive $2,500,000 per year, or answer C.</span>
Education and improvement check with educational sports within an organization created to beautify the knowledge and competencies of personnel even as providing information and coaching on the way to better perform unique tasks.
There are primary alternatives for supervising employee schooling and development in an agency: with the aid of HR or Operations. usually, education and improvement fall beneath the HR branch. But, within the case of HR-owning employee training and development, there is a hazard of disconnection of schooling from a business.
Offering training and improvement to personnel allows employers to pinpoint the know-how and competencies they want their personnel to have. education and development programs can teach personnel about new skills or offer updates on present abilities to enhance productivity.
Learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24660606
#SPJ1
