Answer:
if it is primarily against one body or people
Explanation:
Bias means it speaks factually bias means its an opinion on the situation against a certain group regardless
Because it was an easy source of water for their needs that required it and it was also and easy way to transport supplies to the battle sight if an army was in a foreign location. Hope this helps, if you need clarification let me know?
The Allied's forces strategy was to keep Russia from being conquered. This was for if Russia was to be taken by Germany then they would immediately try to conquer Britain too. There was a conflict though when they had all the dictators meet. This was due that Josef Stalin wanted to go full on attack on Germany since they were getting obliterated by the Germans. Churchill wanted to, however, attack in small groups as he feared they would be easily conquered. This was later resolved by them trying to cooperate and meet eye to eye by meeting up several times during the war to discuss battle plans. Most important being that Franklin Roosevelt came to Yalta in an attempt to have the Russians help end the war by joining the attack of Japan which the Russians accepted only after they accepted to give Russia <span>control over large areas of Europe. I hope this helps but sorry in advance if it doesn't.</span>
Answer:
You have to add a picture cause we can't see what your stuck on
Explanation:
☝
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"What warrant [right] have we to take that land, which is and hath been of long time possessed [by] others . . . ? "That which is common to all is proper to none. [Native Americans] ruleth over many lands without title or property; for they enclose [fence in] no ground, neither have they cattle to maintain it. . . . And why may not Christians have liberty to go and dwell amongst them in their waste[d] lands and woods (leaving them such places as they have [fertilized] for their corn) . . . ? For God hath given to the sons of men a twofold right to the earth; there is a natural right and a civil [political] right. The first right was natural when men held the earth in common, every man sowing and feeding where he pleased. Then, as men and cattle increased, they appropriated some parcels of ground by enclosing [them as property] . . . And this in time got them a civil right."
Descreva brevemente UM argumento apresentado no trecho.
Answer:
Since Native Americans did not claim their civil rights over the land they inhabit, what counts is the natural right that God gave to all men, so it is justifiable for Christians to own the land together with the natives.
Explanation:
The text shown in the question above was written by John Winthrop, who was part of the English team to be the first settlers of North America and later became governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In this text, Winthrop takes a position on the colonists' dictate to live in America, even though it is a land that already had inhabitants and "owners.
In that text, Winthrop claims that God gave men the natural direction over the land, where any land owned them all. Men, through their activities, assumed civil rights over pieces of land, where they became owners and could prevent anyone other than them from using it. However, Native Americans have never claimed civil rights to their land, which allows natural law to prevail and makes room for good Christians to own it.