Answer: Natural slavery is inhumane and degrading.
Explanation:
Although natural slavery seems like it makes sense for a constructive society and Aristotle thought that slaves needed their masters to survive because they were so helpless, he was generalizing and his argument is flawed when most of the slaves who were freed in the 1900s could survive well on their own. I think I can argue against Aristotles arguements for natural slavery because his assumption is that slaves were lesser, more inferior humans or tools. I can disprove these by the obvious mistreatment these slaves were put through like: their owner hitting them or starving them. People who were slaves could not marry or raise children without their owner’s permission. And their owner could sell them or their children at any time.
Answer: True
Explanation: Don't know how to explain this, but its true I think.
Answer:
Dutch
Explanation:
Before the city's called new York, it was previously called New Amsterdam. It's a city that controlled by the Dutch India company for their interest in north America. New Amsterdam was led by Dutch Governor Peter Stuyvesant. But he was considered to be a bad leader, among the settlers.
So, a coalition between natives Americans and the Europeans supported by the British empire took over the city and named it New York. Because of this, We can say that New York was actually established by the Dutch even though it's currently named after a region in England.
My answer would be D. Urban white middle class citizens
