It would be 2.5% because you would set it up as 0.5=p x 20 you divide each side by 20 which should equal 0.025. you move the decimal two places to the right so p actually equals 2.5%
Model :
<span>larga,-adjectiv propriu-zis,variabil,se acorda gen,numar si caz cu sunstantivul ,,curtea"(feminin,singular,acuzativ)
</span>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<span>frumosi- adjectiv propriu-zis , variabil , se acorda in gen numar si caz cu substantivul comun ''cocosii'' (masculin , plural , acuzativ)
</span>lucios-adjectiv propriu-zis , variabil , se acorda in gen numar si caz cu substantivul comun ''pieptul'' (masculin , singural, acuzativ<span>)
</span>albastrii-<span>adjectiv propriu-zis , variabil , se acorda in gen numar si caz cu substantivul comun ''pene'' (feminin, plural, acuzati)
</span>rosie-<span>adjectiv propriu-zis , variabil , se acorda in gen numar si caz cu substantivul comun ''creasta'' (feminin, singural, acuzati)
</span>
mare - <span>adjectiv propriu-zis , variabil , se acorda in gen numar si caz cu substantivul comun ''trufie'' (feminin, singural, acuzati)
</span>
A situation in which you could use Direct perception checking is asking someone they thing about something happening in the world. ex. (florida shooting)
Please rephrase the question..
