Pennsylvania v. Mimms was the case in which the Supreme Court hold that police officers, with reasonable suspicion can order a person out of a car.
The top court in the federal judiciary of the United States is the Supreme Court. All matters heard in U.S. federal courts as well as state court cases involving issues of federal law fall under its exclusive appellate jurisdiction. Additionally, it has exclusive authority over a certain number of matters, including all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, as well as those in which a State shall be Party. The court has the authority to judicially analyse laws and declare them unconstitutional if they do not adhere to the Constitution. It has the authority to invalidate presidential orders for disobeying the Constitution or statutory law.
In which case did the Supreme Court hold that police officers, with reasonable suspicion, can order a person out of a car?
Learn more about the Supreme Court here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
Nestro has committed a battery.
<span>Even though no physical harm resulted, Nestro did initiate offensive or unwanted bodily contact, which constitutes a battery.
According to united states' law, this type of behavior could be punishable by up to 6 month of jail time.</span>
Since they viewed it as a great way to 'decrease the surplus population', having a different, more sympathetic outlook would have helped. Giving them food they could cook and eat would also have helped: the Irish had a lot of trouble trying to prepare and eat the Indian meal they sent. They could also have opened more soup kitchens, told the landlords to show a little leniency and stop evicting people because heir livelihoods were gone and their means of paying rent with them. But they wanted to get rid of the Irish, and so they did. There was a famine in the Scottish Highlands in 1846 and because of charitable efforts nowhere near as many people died. They could have saved them by showing charity, but they didn't.
The best and most correct answer is Most are lawyers -Gradpoint
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Beginning in 1907, Mohandas Gandhi and his followers staged non-violent protests and refused to follow an unjust law in South Africa. One result of Ghandi's methods was that:
D. <u>The South African government repealed a law discriminating against Indians</u>.
Explanation:
Mahatma Gandhi was able to witness firsthand, during his stay in South Africa, the discrimination suffered by the Indians by white people, who even once tried to lynch him, later, in 1906, <em>the South African government of Transvaal, in a fight against immigration of Asian origin, he issued a law that forced all Indians residing in his country to register through a census</em>, which, given the different forms of discrimination, <u>could mean a way to locate and attack them more easily</u>, Therefore Gandhi initiated a peaceful protest the following year that, although it caused from arrests to executions for the Indian people, <u>influenced the government to reverse the law</u>.
