The sun. If that's what you're asking.
A bishop believes that "Kings on Earth should rule with God's authority," which came to be known as 'the Divine Right," or "the Divine right of kings." A French aristocrat has been born into a higher class family and/or was born to a French nobleman. This makes their belief that government rule should only be given to them or someone within their class, as they thought of themselves as the "best" candidates for ruling since they were such noble people. In conclusion, a French aristocrat would not be too happy with the beliefs of the bishop. I hope this helps you out! :)
Answer with Explanation:
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.
The answer to the given question above is BUILD IN REDUNDANCY. From the term itself "redundancy", notice that Sheena is repeating the same information about Marie Curie in all parts of her speech. From the introduction, to the internal summary and transition, up to the conclusion. In this way, audience would easily recall or remember the highlighted information about the topic.
Noliving things because it doesnt any function of living things
