Answer:
In a typical behavior modification program, one needs to select a behavior to modify and describe it completely using concrete terms. Next, one must gather data about target behavior that includes identifying how many times the behavior occurs, identifying triggers, and the consequences that follow the behavior. Then, one should design a program that will both effectively change the behavior and track one's progress in doing so in order to increase wanted behavior or decrease unwanted behavior. Finally, the plan must be put into effect and watched to see whether or not it works. If it does not work, then the plan must be modified, or adjusted. Then the program should be brought to an end be reducing reinforcement gradually.
Explanation:
D is the answer so its correct and your welcome
Answer:
a rebelled against the communists.
Explanation:
the soviet union invaded them in 1979 for a decade.
pls mark brainliest
England, Scotland, Ireland and France. In other words, A.
Despite wide recognition that speculation is critical for successful science, philosophers have attended little to it. When they have, speculation has been characterized in narrowly epistemic terms: a hypothesis is speculative due to its (lack of) evidential support. These ‘evidence-first’ accounts provide little guidance for what makes speculation productive or egregious, nor how to foster the former while avoiding the latter. I examine how scientists discuss speculation and identify various functions speculations play. On this basis, I develop a ‘function-first’ account of speculation. This analysis grounds a richer discussion of when speculation is egregious and when it is productive, based in both fine-grained analysis of the speculation’s purpose, and what I call the ‘epistemic situation’ scientists face.