1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
15

True or false :driving is a simple singularly-focused activity

Business
2 answers:
Flauer [41]3 years ago
6 0
False because you have to check so many places and in different areas where you are driving there are hazards to look out for so it it isn't really that simple
sasho [114]3 years ago
5 0
False because,You have to make sure no one is there it takes skills and putting our eyes on one thing,you could get hit by another
You might be interested in
Helen Ashley is expecting cash flows of $50,000, $75,000, $125,000, and $250,000 from an inheritance over the next four years. I
romanna [79]

Answer:

Present value of Helen's inheritance is $361,997.25

Explanation:

We know,

Present value of cash flows = ∑\frac{Cash flow for n periods}{(1 + i)^{n} }

Given,

Cash flows for 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year = $50,000, $75,000, $125,000, and $250,000.

Interest rate, i = 11% = 0.11

Number of period, n = 4

Therefore,

Present value of cash flows = [$50,000 ÷ (1 + 0.11)^{1}] + [$75,000 ÷ (1 + 0.11)^{2}] + [$125,000 ÷ (1 + 0.11)^{3}] + [$250,000 ÷ (1 + 0.11)^{4}]

Present value of cash flows = ($50,000 ÷ 1.11) + ($75,000 ÷ 1.2321) + ($125,000 ÷ 1.3676) + ($250,000 ÷ 1.5181)

Present value of cash flows = $45,045.05 + $60,871.68 + $91,400.99 + $164,679.53

Present value of cash flows = $361,997.25

Therefore, Present value of Helen's inheritance is $361,997.25

5 0
4 years ago
Microsoft and a smaller rival often have to select from one of two competing technologies, A and B. The rival always prefers to
Nuetrik [128]

Answer: true, there is an equilibrium.

Explanation:

the above game is a pure strategy. A pure strategy occur when the game is strictly determined. the criteria used to determine the pure strategy is maxi-min and min-max. max-min means selecting the least case from all best cases and min-max means selecting the best from all least cases.

Base on the criterion, the least out of all best for max-min is 1 unit and the best out of all least cases for min-max is 1 unit. the max-min is equal to the min-max,hence it strictly determined and therefore a pure strategy.

5 0
3 years ago
Nielsen PRIZM uses ________ segmentation to classify every U.S. household as one of 66 unique market segments based on the belie
Gemiola [76]

Nielsen PRIZM uses Market Segmentation.  

Explanation:

Market division is the way toward isolating a market of potential clients into gatherings, or sections, in view of various qualities. The fragments made are made out of buyers who will react also to showcasing procedures and who share qualities, for example, comparable interests, needs, or areas.  

Market division makes it simpler for advertisers to customize their promoting efforts.  

By organizing their organization's objective market into divided gatherings, as opposed to focusing on every potential client exclusively, advertisers can be increasingly effective with their time, cash, and different assets than if they were focusing on buyers on an individual level.

Gathering comparable shoppers enables advertisers to target explicit spectators in a financially savvy way.   Market division additionally lessens the danger of a fruitless or ineffectual showcasing effort.

At the point when advertisers separate a market dependent on key attributes and customize their procedures dependent on that data, there is an a lot higher possibility of progress than if they somehow managed to make a conventional battle and attempt to actualize it over all sections.

7 0
3 years ago
Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that hi
tangare [24]

Answer:

The correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete because some important figures and points are missing in it. These figures and points are therefore provided to complete the question before answering it as follows:

Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that his marginal benefit from an additional soft drink is $100 and his marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza is $110. If the price of a soft drink is $2 and the price of a slice of pizza is $3, is Charley maximizing his total benefits?

A. No, he should increase his consumption of both goods.

B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

C. Yes, there is no other consumption choice that will make his total benefits greater.

D. No, he should shift consumption toward pizza and away from soft drinks to maximize total benefits.'

The explanation of the answer is now provided as follows:

Under utility maximization theory, the condition for the utility or benefit maximization for two goods is as follows:

MBs / Ps = MBp / Pp ……………………………. (1)

Where:

MBs = Marginal benefit from an additional soft drink = $100

MBp = Marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza =$110

Ps = Price of a soft drink = $2

Pp = Price of a slice of pizza = $3

Subtitling the relevant values, we have:

MBs / Ps = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft drinks = $100 / $2 = 50

MBp / Pp = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft pizza = $110 / $3 = 36.67

This implies that 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67

The decision rule is that the limited money income should be spent by a consumer on the good which gives the higher marginal utility per dollar in order to maximize marginal benefit.

Since 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67 above, this implies that Charley is NOT maximizing his total benefits. To maximize his total benefits, Charley should consume more of soft drinks and less of pizza until the condition is consistent with equation (1).

Therefore, the correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

7 0
3 years ago
Elevator speech is another term for
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

An elevator pitch, elevator speech, or elevator statement is a short description of an idea, product, or company that explains the concept in a way such that any listener can understand it in a short period of time.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a prohibited escrow-related activity? An escrow agent cannot disburse a real estate broker's commi
    5·1 answer
  • An example of negative peer pressure may include
    9·2 answers
  • Intangible assets are reported on the balance sheet
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the basic measure of a nation's economic growth rate?
    6·2 answers
  • When comparing two distributions, it would be best to use relative frequency histograms rather then frequency histograms when?
    11·1 answer
  • Microsoft hires marketing and sales specialists to decide what prices it should set for its products, whereas a wealthy corn far
    9·1 answer
  • The Chicago National League Ball Club (Chicago Cubs) operated Wrigley Field, the Cubs’s home park. Through the 1965 baseball sea
    15·1 answer
  • A hockey team plays in an arena with a seating capacity of 15 000 spectators. With ticket prices set at $12, average attendance
    15·1 answer
  • In France, fine dressmaking and tailoring have been a tradition predating Queen Marie Antoinette. Cloth manufacturers, design sc
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!