Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3000 600
5000 1000
6000 1200
7500 1500
No it doesn't form a proportional relationship because yes, the ratio is constant AFTER the 5,000, you do need to hit the 5,000 first, and then it changes. So no, it's not proportional because it isn't constant throughout the entirety of the relationship. If you're just going based on the table in question, then yes it will be proportional since it doesn't have the 5,000 in it but if you're looking at it in it's entirety, no it's not.
Answer:
x = -5/7
Step-by-step explanation:
8 1
---------- = ----------
x+3 x+1
Using cross products
8 (x+1) = 1 (x+3)
Distribute
8x+8 = x+3
Subtract x from each side
8x-x +8 = x-x+3
7x+8 =3
Subtract 8 from each side
7x +8-8 =3-8
7x = -5
Divide each side by 7
7x/7 = -5/7
x = -5/7
A. 16 is divisible by 2 but not divisible by 3
B. 23 is not divisible neither by 2 nor 3
C. 27 is not divisible by 2, however it's divisible by 3
D. 36 is divisible both by 2 and 3
So the only number we can focus on is 36:
36 ÷ 2 = 18
36 ÷ 3 = 12
36 ÷ 6 = 6
Answer: D, 36 supports the given conjecture.
Can you add the picture so im able to see and help :)
Answer:
what do you mean for this question. What do you need help on?
