Answer:
Phone, Medkit and flash light
Explanation:
There's no spicific Natural Disaster so there's no spicific reason to choose "that" or "this"
Answer:
<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct
</u>
<em>Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options/
</em>
- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
- Option C: ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
- Option D: interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other
Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written. Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable. Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.
<u>Look at attachment</u>
The sentences both changed and unchanged are written below:
- CSU East Bay once had a different name
- Hot is ambiguous
- Lady Gaga used to be called "Stefani Germanotta"
- "NASA" is an acronym.
- Racism is offensive.
- "Sound" means being valid and having true premises.
- There are two vowels in vowel.
- "Evita" is a Spanish name.
<h3>What are quotation marks?</h3>
Quotation marks (" ") are known to be a form of punctuation marks that are used in pairs in writing in order to identify direct speech, a phrase or a quotation. It consists of an opening quotation mark and a closing quotation mark.
We can see that the use of quotation marks above actually show the specific word being referred to.
Learn more about quotation marks on brainly.com/question/2762082