<em>Answer:</em>
<em>Personally I'd choose option "D" They believed in a system of checks and balances</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>The Federalists wanted a strong, and a central government, so the first option would be incorrect. Also, they didn't fear the presidency would become too powerful, making the third option incorrect. The last option is incorrect because the Federalists supported the ratification of Constitution as they noticed the weaknesses of the Articles.</em>
Answer:
The clauses of the Constitution, which give Congress authority to raise and support armies, and so forth, were not inserted to endow the national government rather than the States with the power to do these things but to designate the department of the Federal Government, which would exercise the powers. As we have noted above, the English king was endowed with the power not only to initiate war but the power to raise and maintain armies and navies.1637 Aware historically that these powers had been used to the detriment of the liberties and well-being of Englishmen and aware that in the English Declaration of Rights of 1688 it was insisted that standing armies could not be maintained without the consent of Parliament, the Framers vested these basic powers in Congress.
Explanation:
Which battle??? You are aware there wasn't just one battle right?
Answer:
The Articles of Confederation served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was an agreement among the 13 original states of the United States of America that served as its first constitution. ... A guiding principle of the Articles was to preserve the independence and sovereignty of the states.
The answer to this question is Russia
