The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
Well, when the countries of<span> France and Britain had been at war, Washington had taken a middle position. What he did was proposing a declaration of neutrality. Which by the way had been a statement that the United States of America would support neither France or Britain in the war. Hamilton and Jefferson agreed that getting involved in the war wouldn't have been great for the United States of America.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest</span>
Answer:Gregor Mendel, through his work on pea plants, discovered the fundamental laws of inheritance. He deduced that genes come in pairs and are inherited
Explanation: Because he discorved 14 of them
good luck
