Answer:
Parallel structure can happen WITHIN one sentence or ACROSS multiple sentences. True
Explanation:
Parallel structure implies practicing the equivalent pattern of words to determine that two or more approaches have the equivalent level of greatness. This can happen at the word, idiom, or sentence level. The common way to connect parallel structures is with the application of organizing conjunctions such as "and" or "or."
I think its d. because it made it a lot faster and easier to clean the seeds out of the cotton
Answer:
Many of the ideas concerning separation of powers and protection of rights were implemented in the United States.
Explanation:
The 1688 revolution, also known as the glorious revolution, was influenced by political and religious difficulties in the country at that time. It resulted in the dismissal of King James II. It promoted the power of parliament by diminishing the power of the monarchy and influencing the current democratic laws of Great Britain.
After the effects of the glorious revolution, the declaration of the rights of England was drafted, this declaration was intended to establish the duties and rights of the king and citizens, as well as to separate each of the powers.
Following the example of England, when the United States of America proclaimed its independence from Great Britain, it took as an example the declaration of rights of England to draft the Declaration of Independence, which establishes the human rights of the new nation. It also takes as an example of the separation of powers by separately establishing the executive, judicial, and legislative power.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
Many Americans worried that citizens of Japanese ancestry would act as spies or saboteurs for the Japanese government. Fear — not evidence — drove the U.S. to place over 127,000 Japanese-Americans in concentration camps for the duration of WWII. Over 127,000 United States citizens were imprisoned during World War II.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
