Hello there,
Your correct answer's would be:
C) The people of France can truly find "sanctuary" in the church when they are unjustly persecuted by the government.
A) A person can always change, no matter what mistakes he has in his past.
D) Valjean would effectively be able to communicate the thoughts and feelings of others.
Hope this helps.
~HotTwizzlers :D
Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
Answer:
Indirect speech:
<em>that he never been to Boston</em>
<em>that they might agree to do that</em>
<em>that Tom wouldn´t enjoy that movie</em>
Explanation:
The indirect speech refers to the part of a sentence that shows what a 3rd person has said or thought or expressed otherwise. Therefore, the indirect speech starts after:
<em>Tom told...</em>
<em>They told us...</em>
<em>Marie said...</em>
<em />
B. Many people lost their jobs during the Great Depression.
the phrase “Great Depression” is a proper noun so it needs to be capitalized
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I'm 95% sure it's A but B could also be a likely answer.
