Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
What is supposed to be answered?
Form of church government.
The benefits of living in society instead of nature are:
1. If we lived alone with no human life around us we would probably die out faster because we would no longer be working as a team.
2. By living and communication with other people we have learned to work as a team and team work is more efficient than working alone.
3. The last benefit is if we didn't live all together we would have no relationships with the people around us nor any family.
Hope this helps!
Please mark brainliest:)
Answer:
it allows the reader to feel empathy towards the scene or what is going on, it begins to reveal a message and depending on how its given, it shows what is going on without actually saying what's happening
