1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ValentinkaMS [17]
2 years ago
8

Case: Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka -How might life be different for society today if the court had ruled the opposite way

?
History
1 answer:
andrezito [222]2 years ago
8 0
Uh to put it simply, schools would likely still be segregated. SCOTUS (Supreme Court) ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. So, if not for Brown, schools would likely still be segregated. You can rewrite this and put it into your own words if need be.
You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP QUICKLY!
icang [17]
B is the only option that makes sense. The graph shows a positive result, so A and C are out. Totally forget about D.... the bubonic plague would KILL, not give birth! 

Hope this Helps! :)
8 0
4 years ago
Who was the winner of the battle of Greenville between little turtle and US Gen St. Clair
masya89 [10]

Answer:

Little turtle

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Do you agree or disagree with the ming emperor who ended the voyages of exploration why
gogolik [260]

Answer:

agree

Explanation:

In part, the sense of surprise and even bewilderment that the Ming government's decision elicits in western observers arises from a misunderstanding about the original purpose of Zheng He's voyages. Less than a century later, in 1497, the Portuguese explorer Vasco da Gama traveled to some of the same places from the west; he also called in at the ports of East Africa, and then headed to India, the reverse of the Chinese itinerary. Da Gama went in search of adventure and trade, so many westerners assume that the same motives inspired Zheng He's trips.

However, the Ming admiral and his treasure fleet were not engaged in a voyage of exploration, for one simple reason: the Chinese already knew about the ports and countries around the Indian Ocean. Indeed, both Zheng He's father and grandfather used the honorific hajji, an indication that they had performed their ritual pilgrimage to Mecca, on the Arabian Peninsula. Zheng He was not sailing off into the unknown.

Likewise, the Ming admiral was not sailing out in search of trade. For one thing, in the fifteenth century, all the world coveted Chinese silks and porcelain; China had no need to seek out customers — China's customers came to them. For another, in the Confucian world order, merchants were considered to be among the lowliest members of society. Confucius saw merchants and other middlemen as parasites, profiting on the work of the farmers and artisans who actually produced trade goods. An imperial fleet would not sully itself with such a lowly matter as trade.

If not trade or new horizons, then, what was Zheng He seeking? The seven voyages of the Treasure Fleet were meant to display Chinese might to all the kingdoms and trade ports of the Indian Ocean world and to bring back exotic toys and novelties for the emperor. In other words, Zheng He's enormous junks were intended to shock and awe other Asian principalities into offering tribute to the Ming.

So then, why did the Ming halt these voyages in 1433, and either burn the great fleet in its moorings or allow it to rot (depending upon the source)?

3 0
3 years ago
Name two actions that William Lloyd Garrison took to oppose slavery.
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

In 1830 he started an abolitionist paper

When the Civil War broke out, he continued to blast the Constitution as a pro-slavery document.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a basic constitutional tradeoff
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

The trade-off is political in nature: just as democracy and democracy quality are purely politically or procedurally defined, trade-offs are only relevant for democracy quality, if they are situated in the political sphere. Hence, economic trade-offs are not considered.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Recall the Justinian Code shown below.
    5·1 answer
  • The Battle of Saratoga marked a turning point in the American Revolution because
    10·1 answer
  • Describe 3 of the traits that a courtier needed to possess according to the writings of Castiglione
    11·1 answer
  • How often does the us have federal elections?
    15·1 answer
  • The passage below is a quotation from Louis Saint-Just, a radical supporter of the French Revolution. Use the passage to answer
    12·2 answers
  • OK IK THIS IS ALOT BUT LIKE I HAVE A 8% IN THIS CLASS PLEASE HELP Question 10
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these focused attention on the nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union?
    12·1 answer
  • Rewrite the preamble to the Declaration of Independence in your own words
    7·1 answer
  • Pls help pls and thank you
    12·1 answer
  • What makes the king's speech so memorable and powerful
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!