Absolute monarchy in France led to continued acceptance of serfdom, while in England serfdom disappeared.
Constitutional monarchy in England led to representative government without a revolution, while France required a revolution.
Absolutism in France delayed the intellectual Enlightenment, while England's constitutional monarchy fostered the Enlightenment.
England's constitutional monarchy efficiently corrected the ills of poverty, while in France the monarchy ignored the poor.
<span>he did not offer it to former confederate officials or military officers because those officials and officers could start a rebellion </span><span />
Answer:
1.They taught the Indians to live in peace with other tribes, 2. to support their families through farming and other practical occupations.
Explanation:
Where is the rest of the question
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I looked up the definition of each answer and social contract mentions all joining a whole
