Being "critical" means being skeptical and not automatically trusting sources at face value. Thus, being a critical consumer of the news would include such actions as double-checking everything, not automatically trusting anything, being unbiased, and getting multiple sources.
Therefore, the answer that is the least critical, and thus NOT being a critical consumer, is A.
I believe the answer to this question is A common law
Answer:
Conservation of mechanical energy
Explanation:
Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy: The total amount of mechanical energy, in a closed system in the absence of dissipative forces (e.g. friction, air resistance), remains constant.
In the absence of air resistance, the mechanical energy of an object moving through the air in the Earth's gravitational field, remains constant (is conserved) while the opposite is the case when there is air resistance involved.
<span>the word "science" defines everything around us and
beyond our human imagination. understanding science is always a lot tougher
than other topics and it requires a mind and brain far more sophisticated than
the average level. if one reads a science article, he /she must always look for
author's biases. an author's bias is basically his/her opinions and theory. but
most of the time, science articles always has author's biases to be unbiased
cause it is a factual interpretation. if the author is biased, then the facts
or ideas could be misinterpreting and could lead to some false concepts and
news.</span>
