Answer:
a. The Bt toxin could negatively affect the taste of the food that is produced from these crops.
c. The Bt toxin could result in the death of non-pest species of insects. d. The Bt gene could ultimately make the plants pathogenic to humans.
Explanation:
Genetically engineered crops couldn't harm the economy. They are made to benefit economy, as it's shown in the following quote:
"The commercialization of genetically modified (GM) crops has continued to occur at a rapid rate, with important changes in both the overall level of adoption and impact occurring in 2012.
This annual updated analysis shows that there have been very significant net economic benefits at the farm level amounting to $18.8 billion in 2012 and $116.6 billion for the 17-year period (in nominal terms)."
Reference: Brookes, Graham, and Peter Barfoot. “Economic Impact of GM Crops.” Taylor & Francis, 2014,
Answer:
a.mechanistic
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that it seems that Fine Lines Inc. is using a mechanistic structure. This type of structure, also known as a bureaucratic structure, is a structure based on a single formal and centralized network where authority comes from the top-level managers who make most of the decisions.
Answer:
$500,000 Axle Corporation's basis in the Drexel Corporation stock.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The preparation of income statement is shown below:-
Income Statement
Service revenue $80,000
operating expenses
Salary expenses $28,000
Uncollectible accounts
expense $3,273
Total operating expense $31,273
Net income $48,727
Working Note :-
Days Amount Percentage Allowance balance
Current $16,800 0.01 $168
0-30 $5,100 0.05 $255
31-60 $4,000 0.10 $400
61-90 $2,000 0.30 $600
Over 90
days $3,700 0.50 $1,850
Total $31,600 $3,273
b. The computation of net realizable value of the accounts receivable is shown below:-
Net realizable value = Accounts receivable - Allowance for doubtful accounts
= ($80,000 - $48,400) - $3,273
= $31,600 - $3,273
= $28,327
Answer:
The statement is not an express warranty, because it doesn't involve a negotiation of terms between Salazar and Mitsubishi. It is an employee of the company that imploy Salazar to bring the car should the car gives problem, and didn't involve an agreement between the two parties ( Salazar and Mitsubishi)
Explanation:
What is express warranty?
An express warranty arises from the parties’ negotiations in a sales transaction. Express warranties are often included in the written terms of a contract. An “express” warranty by a seller is created by:
Any statement of fact or promise relating to the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the statement or promise.
Any description of the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the description.
Any sample or model, which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the sample or model.
An express warranty may be created even if the seller does not use formal words such as “warranty” or “guarantee,” and even if the seller does not have a specific intention to make a warranty. However, an express warranty is not created merely because the seller makes a statement as to the value of the goods, or as to seller’s opinion of the goods. Generally, statements made by a seller during the course of contract negotiations are treated as statements of fact, unless it can be shown that the buyer could only have reasonably considered the statement to be an opinion.
