Answer:
True. As a former US Lawyer, Senator and the 7th President of the United States of America, Andrew JAckson championed this idea of the president bieng incharge of the national policy issues rather than leaving it in the hand of the Congress.
<em>He is known as the peoples president due to the series of policies he initiated like the support of individual liberty, the policy that caused the forced migration of the native Americans etc.</em>
<em>His use of the veto power is also another way which he demonstrated the idea that the president rather than congress should take the lead in national policy issues. </em>A typical example is the bill on the bill through Congress to re-charter the second bank of America (institution) which he vetoed (the rejection of the bill) because it encourages the advancement of the few individual at the expense of other citizens.
Explanation:
Based on the given paragraph, the statement that would shift the nation X's PPC is the statement: "Within three months of coming into office, Bertolini passed regulations that made college education available to students from low-income families". This is so because the statement shows a great achievement coming from a female president from an island who accomplished so much within a short period of time. The other statements are just supporting statements of the main spotlight statement. For example, the last statement about the female astronaut is out of context, therefore, we cannot refer this as the main content of the paragraph. <span />
<span>1) Trade
2)Taxation
3) Presiding Official
4) Government format.
5) Population and trade count.</span>
Tell people about history
Answer:
No. In an 8-1 decision authored by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, the Court concluded that the relevant sections of the Enforcement Act lacked the necessary, limiting language to qualify as enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The Chief Justice first stated that the Fifteenth Amendment "does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," but "prevents the States, or the United States, however, from giving preference…to one citizen of the United States over another on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In examining the language of the Enforcement Act, the Court noted that, while the first two sections of the act explicitly referred to race in criminalizing interference with the right to vote, the relevant third and fourth sections refer only to the "aforesaid" offense. According to the Court, this language does not sufficiently tailor the law to qualify as "appropriate legislation" under the Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
