The difference that human resource has from land and capital is that it has to do with the physical effort that humans bring in the production of goods and services.
<h3>What is human resources?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the skills and the knowledge that humans have to bring into the production process. This is the physical skill that people have that allows for the production of goods and services during production,.
An example of this is labor. This is one of the factors of production. Hence we can say that human resource is different because it is the skills that people have.
Read more on human resources here: brainly.com/question/10583893
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is: <span>fluid intelligence
</span><span>fluid intelligence refers to the form of intelligence that allow us to utilize our logic to solve the problem or identify the patterns that we never encountered before.
For most people, </span><span>fluid intelligence would peak when we enter middle age and would start to deteriorate from that point.</span><span />
Mussolini came into power in 1922, his followers were called black shirts :)
As students of history in the 21st century, we have many comprehensive resources pertaining to the First World War that are readily available for study purposes. The origin of these primary, secondary and fictional sources affect the credibility, perspective and factual information resulting in varying strengths and weaknesses of these sources. These sources include propaganda, photographs, newspapers, journals, books, magazine articles and letters. These compilations allow individuals to better understand the facts, feeling and context of the home front and battlefield of World War One.
Autobiographies, diaries, letters, official records, photographs and poems are examples of primary sources from World War One. The two primary sources…show more content…
Wilfred Owen asks where are the “…passing-bells for these who die as cattle?” The author of “Anthem for Doomed Youth” leads his reader through his personal struggle and frustration of war. Owen has an abrasive approach when describing the death all around him and clearly expresses his anger with the “hasty orisons” for the dead. He speaks directly of battlefront in the first octet and then includes the home front in the second half of his sonnet. Owen’s purpose is not a commemoration of fallen soldiers. Rather, he divulges the disgust and disappointment of war. Like McCrae, Wilfred Owen paints a picture of the multitude of deaths. Back at the home front, “…each slow dusk a drawing-down of blinds.” We can construe that the author is not simply talking about preparing for bed in the evening, but rather lowering the blinds in a room where yet another dead soldier lies, as an indication to the community and out of respect for the soldier. There is a lack of “passing-bells for these who die as cattle….no prayers nor bells; Nor any voice of mourning save the choirs.” Owen writes as though he feels that there is indifference among the death of his fellow soldiers. The poem, “In Flanders Fields,” is impregnated with imagery. “This poem was literally born of fire and blood during the hottest phase of the second battle of Ypres.” John McCrae had just lost his very close
