This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Frankie is in charge of writing a script for a television show, along with six other writers. The script must be finished by the end of the week. Frankie’s co-workers all bring slightly different strengths to the table, but all are at least competent. Frankie wants to write the best possible script in the generous amount of time he has to work with. In this example, which style of leadership would be most effective for Frankie’s goals?
a. Authoritarian
b. Coaching
c. Democratic
d. Delegative
Answer:
The style of leadership that would be most effective for Frankie's goals is:
C. democratic.
Explanation:
If Frankie acts as a democratic leader, he will make the most out of each member's strengths. <u>Democratic leaders allow the group's members to be more participative when it comes to decision making. Frankie will be able to encourage them to share their ideas, views, opinions, etc. Frankie is the one who will ultimately make the final decisions, but he will certainly have more material to work with, more ideas to consider, if he listens to everyone. And, since no one in his team is especially weak, there seems to be no or little disadvantage in using the leadership style.</u>
Answer: They emphasize the idea that people should fight hard to survive
The correct answer is B. It too narrow
Explanation:
Writing a research paper involves reading, analyzing, and citing multiple sources to understand or describe an event or phenomenon through a formal paper. In the case of history, it is expected the event analyzed is broad enough that it requires consulting multiple sources and it can be developed in 5 to 10 pages.
This does not occur with the topic chosen by Ilana because she is focusing on only one day, which is too narrow for a research paper. Indeed, it is likely there are only a few sources about this event and the complete topic can be developed in only a couple of pages, which is not enough for a research paper.
The answer is C.
The narrator speaks using an authorial voice.
(just took the test, hope this helps)
:)
In order to become a more proficient writer, you need to be able to think of your writing in "global" and "local" ways. According to the Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing Concise Edition, "You revise locally whenever you make changes to a text that affect only the one or two sentences that you are currently working on. In contrast, you revise globally when a change in one part of your draft drives changes in other parts of the draft" (275).
Basically, global revision involves the big picture of your essay; it relates to ideas, purpose, audience, evidence, analysis, and organization.
Local revision focuses more on sentence-level revision: changing words so that a sentence is clearer, correcting grammatical or spelling errors, etc.
As a writer, part of your job is to be a successful global reviser as well as a successful local reviser.
