1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gwar [14]
2 years ago
9

What was two ways that the Roman Republic was successful and useccessful

History
2 answers:
viva [34]2 years ago
8 0
What was two ways that the Roman Republic was successful and unsuccessful?



How was the Roman Republic unsuccessful?
Answer: The Roman Republic was in trouble. It had three major problems. First the Republic needed money to run, second there was a lot of graft and corruption amongst elected officials, and finally crime was running wild throughout Rome.

In what ways were Roman republic successful?

Answer: Rome became the most powerful state in the world by the first century BCE through a combination of military power, political flexibility, economic expansion, and more than a bit of good luck.
Liula [17]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

They created concrete, and water ducts. Overexpansion and military overspending

Explanation:

The creation of these two things allowed for greater construction and stronger buildings. then aquaducts allowed for water to be dispersed and given to all people in the cities.  Because of the overexpansion resourcese were stretched to thin and overspending caused the empire to fall into extreme debt

You might be interested in
how did the various churches, established and non-established, fundamentally shape 18th century colonial life, including educati
erik [133]
The various churches, established and non-established, fundamentally shaped 18th-century colonial life, including education and politics through infusing a sense of unity in the colonies. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help. 
3 0
3 years ago
Do you believe that democracies still face the challenges that Thucydides and Aristophanes complained of in Athens, such as dema
Dvinal [7]

Yes.

Even though democracy in theory must be something almost completely free of influence, all the influence of the people who have more power in society is still great, and it increases as social inequality grows

In situations where the population is in favor of deconcentrating income and wealth, this will has not found support in the political arena. On the one hand, there are those who insist on denying the problem, stating that the growth of social inequality does not produce adverse effects for society; on the other, there are those who declare that nothing can be done about the matter, since the culprits would be the <u>“market forces”</u>, neutral and impersonal economic mechanisms.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did France fall so easily to the Nazis?
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

in France there was a very strong support of extreme right (this terms is quite broad and does not include so-called nazism) already before the Great War. After 1870 French extreme right became quite powerful and had a stimulating support of intellectuals (Barres, Maurras) who were able to stimulate new generations ...a big part of intellectual elite invited Mussolini´s coup and in 30s there was a hayday of French right. When Hitler came in poweŕ, he had a strong support among French. But French extreme-right was frequently more conservative than modern (nazism).

Explanation:

Jacques Doriot (leader and founder of PPF), writer Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, Robert Brasillach or Céline had many motives to support nazism. They believed in something that could be called "revolution of the body and instinct", the criticized democracy of the IIIrd republic because of its liberalism and intellectualism. They wanted strong leader and politics of body and instinct. But they were never united. In the government there was a division between "marchalistes" (followers of Pétain) and "lavalistes" (folloowers of pro-nazi laval).

8 0
2 years ago
Egypt and Israel continue to fight and bring even more instability to the Middle East. You are very concerned about this situati
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
You will need the power of the pharo
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effect has the creation of nation-states in Europe had on today’s society?
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

The answer is below:

Explanation:

Some of the main effects that the creation of nation-states in Europe had on today’s society can be described as

1. It had led to an increase in the uniform national culture through state policy.

2. It has led to more demands for nationalism principles.

Note: a nation-state is a type of state or country in which the majority speaks the same language or have the same cultural background with little or nothing

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the civil war, Robert E. Lee decided to invade union territory in order to
    14·2 answers
  • How did early agriculturalists make sure that their crops were not of poor quality?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these is a role of Congress? A) to veto legislation B) to pass the federal budget C) to nominate Cabinet members D) to
    9·1 answer
  • How were Puritan communities run? pls answer the question pls nowwwww
    15·1 answer
  • Why did Germany resume unrestricted submarine warfare in 1917?
    13·2 answers
  • The role of the media in the Vietnam War was relatively small compared to other American wars. True or false?
    14·1 answer
  • What does dissent mean
    8·1 answer
  • 2. Which region averaged the shortest summers and the longest harshest winters?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the message of this poster?
    11·1 answer
  • The name "Black Shirts" was given to supporters of
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!