As emperor, Napoleon made all of the following changes except "<span>Allowing noble émigrés to return to France" although there were definitely a few exceptions. </span>
Communism, socialism, democracy?? Hope this helped. Let me know if you were looking for a different type of answer
<span>There are numerous lessons that the Progressive Era can offer about the United States and their social problems in 2017. Some of the lessons are; to educate women and minorities, to have a fair government, to have minimum wage, and they don't need to push all immigrant groups to be Americanized. Another thing that could help the social problems today is to still create fair and safe working conditions at every work site. </span>
Thousands of Allied troops were marched to their death as they walked to their prison camp. They were treated miserably, often hit and told to march all day.
Very few of the many Allied troops that marched survived
hope this helps
Explanation:
After winning the 1936 presidential election in a landslide, Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a bill to expand the membership of the Supreme Court. The law would have added one justice to the Court for each justice over the age of 70, with a maximum of six additional justices. Roosevelt’s motive was clear – to shape the ideological balance of the Court so that it would cease striking down his New Deal legislation. As a result, the plan was widely and vehemently criticized. The law was never enacted by Congress, and Roosevelt lost a great deal of political support for having proposed it. Shortly after the president made the plan public, however, the Court upheld several government regulations of the type it had formerly found unconstitutional. In National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, for example, the Court upheld the right of the federal government to regulate labor-management relations pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Many have attributed this and similar decisions to a politically motivated change of heart on the part of Justice Owen Roberts, often referred to as “the switch in time that saved nine.” Some legal scholars have rejected this narrative, however, asserting that Roberts' 1937 decisions were not motivated by Roosevelt's proposal and can instead be reconciled with his prior jurisprudence.
